Grade 12 · printable course

Literature, Rhetoric, and the Examined Life (Part 2)

Grade 12, Units 5-8 · 328 pages · 36 lessons · PDF, print at home

A full-year capstone course in which seniors read complex literary and informational texts across genres and centuries, epic and dramatic tragedy, satire, existentialist and absurdist fiction, foundational American and British nonfiction, and contemporary argument, while producing sustained literary analysis, rhetorical analysis, and research-based argument. The course treats each unit's texts as a sustained conversation about how individuals justify their choices, obligations, and beliefs against competing authorities (fate, state, reason, self, tradition), culminating in an independent research-and-argument project and a synthesis unit pairing a full-length novel with public argument. Building on English 11's work in sustained argument and rhetorical analysis, the course foregrounds close reading of increasingly ambiguous texts, structural comparison across works, and the composition of arguments that must survive counterargument. This volume holds units 5 to 8: The Rhetoric of Principle: Rights, Conscience, and Civil Disobedience; Existentialism and the Absurd: When No Authority Holds; The Research Seminar: Building a Defensible Position; Synthesis: The Novel in Public Argument.

Delivered by email within minutes as a PDF stamped with your name. Print any part as often as you need for the children in your household; the link never expires.

$21.99

one household licence

What is inside

Every unit and lesson in this book, in order. The same lessons are taught online at lettersanddevotion.com, so a family can move between paper and screen.

Literature, Rhetoric, and the Examined Life

36 lessons · try a lesson online free

Unit 5: The Rhetoric of Principle: Rights, Conscience, and Civil Disobedience9 lessons
  1. 37.The premise-evidence-conclusion structure of the Declaration of Independence's argument
  2. 38.Ethos-building strategies specific to a text arguing for the legitimacy of collective political action rather than personal credibility
  3. 39.The distinction between conscience-based and higher-law-based justifications for civil disobedience
  4. 40.The specific historical counterarguments 'Letter from Birmingham Jail' answers
  5. 41.The adequacy of King's rebuttal to the gradualism objection in 'Letter from Birmingham Jail'
  6. 42.Premise identification and counterargument evaluation applied to a novel argumentative text
  7. 43.An original argument justifying or opposing a named contemporary act of civil disobedience
  8. 44.The relationship between rebuttal strategy and underlying theory of legal legitimacy across two foundational texts
  9. 45.Thesis selection in comparative rhetorical analysis, arrived at after weighing textual evidence rather than before
Unit 6: Existentialism and the Absurd: When No Authority Holds8 lessons
  1. 46.Fate-vs-agency positions in tragic versus existentialist frameworks
  2. 47.The four core existentialist/absurdist terms
  3. 48.Authenticity versus bad faith as applied to protagonist behavior
  4. 49.The protagonist's changing relationship to a named authority across the novel
  5. 50.The nihilism/absurdism distinction applied to a new text
  6. 51.The novel's ending as resolution or refusal-to-resolve of the individual-vs-authority tension
  7. 52.Transfer of the four core terms to an unfamiliar narrative situation
  8. 53.The individual-vs-authority question across Units 1, 5, and 6
Unit 7: The Research Seminar: Building a Defensible Position10 lessons
  1. 54.The difference between a researchable question and a debate prompt
  2. 55.The four-part credibility checklist (authorship, evidence base, affiliation, currency) run mechanically on a source where all four data points are visible without extra searching
  3. 56.Credibility criteria (authorship, evidence base, affiliation, currency) applied to an unfiltered source
  4. 57.The independence of source credibility from agreement with the student's claim
  5. 58.Counterargument-hunting as a deliberate search strategy distinct from evidence-gathering
  6. 59.Synthesis of conflicting sources versus additive summary
  7. 60.Thesis revision in response to counter-evidence as strengthening versus abandoning an argument
  8. 61.Citation mechanics across five source types in one citation style
  9. 62.Transfer of the full research-planning cycle to an unrehearsed contested claim
  10. 63.Identification of one's own argument's weakest point under live questioning
Unit 8: Synthesis: The Novel in Public Argument9 lessons
  1. 64.The distinction between structural, rhetorical, and thematic reading demands as applied to a single passage
  2. 65.The novel's structural device as an implicit argument about responsibility
  3. 66.Ethos/logos/pathos appeals in a nonfiction public-argument text, including appeals that invoke the right surface feature but fail to function persuasively
  4. 67.The relationship between the novel's implicit claim and a nonfiction text's explicit claim on the same issue
  5. 68.A counterargument-and-rebuttal paragraph integrating literary and nonfiction evidence
  6. 69.The novel's ambiguity as a strength or weakness relative to public argument on its issue
  7. 70.The three-lens synthesis routine applied to unfamiliar novel/issue material
  8. 71.Course-wide vocabulary terms from Units 1-6
  9. 72.The multi-source synthesis essay's organizational structure