Grade 12 · printable course

Literature, Rhetoric, and the Examined Life (Part 1)

Grade 12, Units 1-4 · 337 pages · 36 lessons · PDF, print at home

A full-year capstone course in which seniors read complex literary and informational texts across genres and centuries, epic and dramatic tragedy, satire, existentialist and absurdist fiction, foundational American and British nonfiction, and contemporary argument, while producing sustained literary analysis, rhetorical analysis, and research-based argument. The course treats each unit's texts as a sustained conversation about how individuals justify their choices, obligations, and beliefs against competing authorities (fate, state, reason, self, tradition), culminating in an independent research-and-argument project and a synthesis unit pairing a full-length novel with public argument. Building on English 11's work in sustained argument and rhetorical analysis, the course foregrounds close reading of increasingly ambiguous texts, structural comparison across works, and the composition of arguments that must survive counterargument. This volume holds units 1 to 4: Tragic Form and the Question of Fault; The Architecture of Argument: Ethos, Logos, Pathos, and the Counterargument; Shakespearean Tragedy: Interiority and Persuasion on Stage; Satire: Weaponized Irony.

Delivered by email within minutes as a PDF stamped with your name. Print any part as often as you need for the children in your household; the link never expires.

$21.99

one household licence

What is inside

Every unit and lesson in this book, in order. The same lessons are taught online at lettersanddevotion.com, so a family can move between paper and screen.

Literature, Rhetoric, and the Examined Life

36 lessons · try a lesson online free

Unit 1: Tragic Form and the Question of Fault9 lessons
  1. 1.Hamartia as a tragic-flaw/error-in-judgment concept distinct from accident or villainy
  2. 2.The chorus as a structural device regulating audience distance
  3. 3.Dramatic irony as a knowledge-gap structure
  4. 4.The structural placement of the recognition scene (peripeteia/anagnorisis)
  5. 5.Catharsis as a contested claim about the function of tragedy
  6. 6.Allocation-of-responsibility thesis for Oedipus's catastrophe, evidenced structurally
  7. 7.Transferability of hamartia as an analytic lens beyond Greek tragedy
  8. 8.The distinction between plot-based and structure-based evidence in literary argument
  9. 9.Tragic structure as a generalizable argument-making device
Unit 2: The Architecture of Argument: Ethos, Logos, Pathos, and the Counterargument9 lessons
  1. 10.Ethos, logos, pathos as categories of appeal
  2. 11.Audience-relativity of rhetorical effectiveness
  3. 12.Claim-evidence-warrant structure (Toulmin-derived)
  4. 13.Counterargument and rebuttal as structural argument components
  5. 14.Straw man, false dilemma, and ad hominem fallacies
  6. 15.Strength/weakness of a stated counterargument relative to its strongest available form
  7. 16.Integrated appeal identification and counterargument evaluation applied to a novel controversy
  8. 17.Transferability of the argument-architecture schema across genres/domains
  9. 18.Unit's core rhetorical vocabulary
Unit 3: Shakespearean Tragedy: Interiority and Persuasion on Stage9 lessons
  1. 19.Soliloquy as structural analog and departure from the Greek chorus
  2. 20.Tragic-structure vocabulary (hamartia, dramatic irony, catastrophe) applied to Hamlet
  3. 21.Psychological hamartia in Hamlet
  4. 22.Categories of dramatic irony in manipulation scenes
  5. 23.Ethos/logos/pathos in Antony's funeral oration
  6. 24.The audience's dual position as target and analyst of in-play rhetoric
  7. 25.Structural function of an unseen soliloquy
  8. 26.Appeal sequencing in an unstudied dramatic persuasive speech
  9. 27.The knowledge/performance gap as dramatized through soliloquy vs. persuasive speech
Unit 4: Satire: Weaponized Irony9 lessons
  1. 28.The irony gap between literal and actual claims in a satirical text
  2. 29.The three-part literal-claim/actual-claim/signal routine as modeled
  3. 30.Juvenalian and Horatian satire as points on a spectrum of tone and target severity
  4. 31.Reductio ad absurdum as an argumentative move dramatized within a satirical text
  5. 32.The implicit counterargument a satirical text builds through irony and exaggeration
  6. 33.Target selection as an ethical and rhetorical choice in satire
  7. 34.Transfer of the irony-gap/counterargument analytic routine to an unfamiliar satirical text
  8. 35.A complete rhetorical analysis of a satirical text's irony-based counterargument
  9. 36.The risk that satirical exaggeration undermines the credibility of the real-world problem it targets